Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/4017
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, S. Kyleen_US
dc.contributor.authorFischenich, J. Craig, 1962-en_US
dc.creatorEcosystem Management and Restoration Research Program (U.S.)en_US
dc.creatorEnvironmental Laboratory (U.S.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-16T16:16:10Zen_US
dc.date.available2016-03-16T16:16:10Zen_US
dc.date.issued2016-02en_US
dc.identifier.govdocERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-49en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11681/4017en_US
dc.descriptionTechnical Noteen_US
dc.descriptionStream restoration does not exist as an isolated field of study but instead at the intersection of hydrologic and hydraulic engineering, terrestrial and aquatic ecology, geomorphology, geology, and biogeochemistry. Palmer and Bernhardt (2006) identify the linking of hydrologic processes with ecological outcomes as a starting point for effective, holistic stream restoration design. Accordingly, traditional engineering approaches of quantifying hydrologic processes may be adapted and applied to quantify ecological outcomes (Fischenich and McKay 2011). Poff et al. (1997) identified five critical components of a streamflow hydrograph that regulate ecological process in river ecosystems: magnitude, frequency, duration, timing, and rate of change. Importantly, many of these variables are correlated and care should be taken to avoid redundancy in analyses (Olden and Poff 2003). Quantification of magnitude, frequency, and duration may be — at least in part — accomplished by a traditional tool of the river engineer, the flow duration curve (FDC). FDCs illustrate the percent of time a flow occurred during a given period of record and provide a wealth of information regarding the flow character of a river in an easy-to-understand format. They have traditionally been used for a variety of purposes from hydropower engineering to instream flow quantification. This paper serves to (1) describe the generation of flow duration curves for gaged and ungaged basins; (2) discuss the potential pitfalls and errors associated with these analyses; and (3) highlight potential applications of these curves for stream restoration.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEcosystem Management and Restoration Research Program (U.S.)en_US
dc.format.extent12 pages/1.64 MBsen_US
dc.format.mediumPDF/Aen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)en_US
dc.relationhttp://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/en_US/search/asset/1048406en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnical Note (Ecosystem Management and Restoration Research Program (U.S.)) ; no. ERDC TN-EMRRP-SR-49en_US
dc.rightsApproved for public release; distribution is unlimiteden_US
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobaten_US
dc.subjectHydraulicsen_US
dc.subjectHydrodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectStream restorationen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental managementen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental restorationen_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.subjectFlow duration curveen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and application of flow duration curves for stream restorationen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Technical Note

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ERDC-TN-EMRRP-SR-49.pdf1.68 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open