Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/9074
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorCarleton University. Department of Geography-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Michael W., 1944--
dc.contributor.authorTice, A. R. (Allen R.)-
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-20T13:40:08Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-20T13:40:08Z-
dc.date.issued1988-10-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11681/9074-
dc.descriptionCRREL Report-
dc.descriptionAbstract: The results of a laboratory testing program, carried out to compare two independent methods for determining the unfrozen water content of soils, are described. With the time domain reflectometry method the unfrozen water content is inferred from a calibration curve of apparent dielectric constant vs volumetric water content, determined by experiment. Previously, precise calibration of the TDR technique was hindered by the lack of a reference comparison method, which nuclear magnetic resonance now offers. This has provided a much greater scope for calibration, including a wide range of soil types temperature (unfrozen water content). The results of the testing program yielded a relationship between dielectric constant and volumetric unfrozen water content that is largely unaffected by soil type, although a subtle but apparent dependency on the texture of the soil was noted. It is suggested that this effect originates from the lower valued dielectric constant for adsorbed soil water. In spite of this, the general equation presented may be considered adequate for most practical purposes. The standard error of estimate is 0.015 cm(3) cm(-3), although this may be reduced by calibrating for individual soils. Brief guidelines on system and probe design are offered to help ensure that use of the TDR method will give results consistent with the relationship presented. Note: Numerals in brackets ( ) are exponents.-
dc.publisherCold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (U.S.)-
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)-
dc.relationhttp://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/en_US/search/asset/1001199-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCRREL report ; 88-18.-
dc.rightsApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.-
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created from scans of the Print Resource-
dc.subjectDielectric constant-
dc.subjectSoils-
dc.subjectFrozen soils-
dc.subjectFrozen ground-
dc.subjectTime domain-
dc.subjectreflectometry-
dc.subjectNuclear magnetic resonance-
dc.subjectUnfrozen water content-
dc.titleMeasurement of unfrozen water content of soils: comparison of NMR and TDR methods-
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:CRREL Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CRREL-88-18.pdf273.87 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open