Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/7614
Title: Kaumalapau Harbor, Hawaii, breakwater repair
Authors: United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. Honolulu District
Podoski, Jessica H.
Smith, Thomas D.
Keywords: Breakwater
Concrete armor units
Concrete strength
CORE-LOC®
MCNP
Multibeam survey
T-LiDAR
Wave modeling
Issue Date: May-2012
Publisher: Coastal and Hydraulic Laboratory (U.S.)
Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)
Series/Report no.: ERDC/CHL TR ; 12-7.
Description: Technical report
Cumulative damage to the Kaumalapau Harbor breakwater over the years resulted in nearly total failure of the breakwater armor layer both above and below the waterline. Breakwater repair incorporated use of the largest CORE-LOC® concrete armor units (35 ton) ever placed on a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers structure. Actual construction took about 18 months, and was completed in June 2007. Four different pertinent aspects of this rehabilitation were monitored. Lessons learned from monitoring these four aspects include: 1. CORE-LOC® armor unit material strength and breakage due to movement: (a) Standard methods of specifying concrete strength are not necessarily applicable to coastal structures composed of concrete armor units – more research and development is needed; (b) Construction methods are an integral part of concrete armor unit stability, and variability of methods may contribute to armor layer vulnerability; (c) Small-scale post-construction armor unit movement will not necessarily lead to armor unit breakage. 2. Breakwater structure and armor layer settlement: (a) T-LiDAR is an accurate and comprehensive method for monitoring changes in complex coastal structures such as those with concrete armor units; (b) Maintaining packing density around bends in structure and structure head as much as possible may limit the amount of unit movement and/or damage following construction; (c) Minor settlement and movement of armor units following construction does not affect the integrity of the structure. 3. Concrete breakwater cap: (a) Small-scale post-construction armor unit movement will not necessarily lead to concrete cap settlement or damage; (b) Stability of concrete cap can likely only be field-verified if a wave event causing overtopping of the structure is experienced. 4. Armor layer toe stability: (a) “Cannon” and “straddled” orientation of the first and second rows of CORE-LOC® toe units appears to be a successful placement scheme in this case; (b) Combination of traditional high-density survey methods augmented by visual observation techniques provided a thorough evaluation of underwater structure conditions.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11681/7614
Appears in Collections:Technical Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CHL-TR-12-7.pdf15.18 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open