Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Analysis of short-term variations in beach morphology (and concurrent dynamic processes) for summer and winter periods, 1971-72, Plum Island, Massachusetts
Authors: University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Coastal Research Center.
Abele, Ralph Warren.
Keywords: Beach Morphology.
Beach Profiles.
Meteorological Variables.
Plum Island (Newburyport, Mass.)
Publisher: Coastal Engineering Research Center (U.S.)
Series/Report no.: Miscellaneous report (Coastal Engineering Research Center (U.S.)) ; no. 77-5.
Description: Miscellaneous Report
Abstract: An analysis of the relationship between wave and meteorological variables and beach morphology was undertaken during summer and winter periods, 1971-72, on Plum Island, Massachusetts. Variables were measured or computed bihourly, 24 hours per day, throughout both study periods. The variables were wave period, wave height, breaker type, breaker angle, longshore current velocity, wave steepness, breaker power, windspeed and direction, barometric pressure, air and water temperature, and ground water elevation. Daily topographic maps of the intertidal zone were constructed for 12 beach profiles spaced at 60-meter intervals. Variations in beach process variables, during both the summer and winter periods, were directly related to the passage of high- and low-pressure systems and to the proximity of the system to Plum Island. With an increase in breaker power and breaker steepness, the high tide beach-face gradient increased. Increases in breaker power also resulted in a rise in the level of the ground water surface. Although most process variables were similar for the summer and winter periods, strong offshore winds and extreme low temperatures that accompany polar high-pressure systems are unique to the winter period. Differences in beach morphology within a small area appear to reflect the state of recovery of the beach profiles after a storm. Adjacent profiles at different stages of maturity are controlled by the proximity of the nearshore bar. Th.e closer the bar is to shore, the faster the sediment is returned to the beach zone.
Appears in Collections:Miscellaneous Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MR-CERC-77-5.pdf32.26 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail