Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Field study of the effects of storms on the stability and fate of dredged material in subaqueous disposal areas
Authors: Bokuniewicz, Henry J. (Henry Joseph)
Gebert, Jeffrey A.
Gordon, Robert
Kaminsky, Peter
Pilbeam, Carol C.
Read, Matthew
Tuttle, Catherine
Keywords: Sediment transport--Long Island Sound (N.Y. and Conn.)
Storms--Long Island Sound (N.Y. and Conn.)
Long Island Sound (N.Y. and Conn.)
Dredging spoil
Dredged material
Publisher: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station
Series/Report no.: Technical Report (Dredged Material Research Program (U.S.)) ; no. D-77-22
Abstract: Long Island Sound is a large estuary. Dredged sediment placed on the bottom of the Sound is subject to dispersion by the tidal stream, estuarine circulation, waves, and disturbances of the hydraulic flow field by storms. The tidal stream is the dominant source of energy for the resuspension and transport of sediments; waves do not contribute significantly to dispersion in water depths greater than 60 ft. Random fluctuations in the water velocity are detected at all depths. During a storm fluctuations in velocity increase in intensity and are important agents of sediment resuspension. Direct, wind-driven flow over the bottom is weak, but storm winds cause water level increases up to 3 ft above the usual tidal level. The energy available for sediment transport is then greatly increased. Water level records are used to evaluate seasonal and long-term changes in storm energy release in the Sound. During extreme storm conditions resuspension of the bottom in deep water is limited to a layer of sediment with an average thickness of less than 1 cm. Despite this activity, silt is accumulating in the central Sound at rates as high as 10³ gm/(m² yr). Repeated bathymetric surveys of a deposit of dredged material at the New Haven disposal site show that after initial self-consolidation of the mound, no significant changes in pile configuration occurred over a three-year period; erosion of the deposit is not detected. The data obtained show that to best contain silt-clay dredged material, the disposal site should be on a naturally accreting mud bottom, the disposal operation should emplace a large volume of material on the site expeditiously, and the deposit should be built to an optimum configuration. The capacity of the disposal site is limited by the maximum height of the disposal mound and the maximum slope of the pile sides which present a minimum disturbance of the natural hydraulic regime. The capacity of the New Haven site is estimated to be up to 1.7 x 10⁶ yd³ of unarmored, silty, dredged material. Larger volumes may be contained if the surface of the deposit is armored with coarser material.
Description: Technical Report
Gov't Doc #: Technical Report D-77-22
Rights: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited
Appears in Collections:Technical Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Technical Report D-77-22.pdf4.46 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail