Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11681/45921
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Trubac, Kathryn P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Reynolds, Randall W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cooke, Timothy J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hartshorn, Caylin A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Punt, Douglas A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Donnelly, Christopher J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Callaghan, Caitlin A. | - |
dc.creator | Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (U.S.) | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-07T20:23:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-07T20:23:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-11 | - |
dc.identifier.govdoc | ERDC/CRREL TR-22-23 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11681/45921 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/45921 | - |
dc.description | Technical Report | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Operating vehicles in extremely cold environments is a significant problem for not only the public but also the military. The Department of Defense has encountered issues when trying to reliably cold start large, heavy-duty military vehicles, specifically the M1126 Stryker Combat Vehicle, in cold regions. As noted in previous work, the issue stems from the current battery technology’s limited temperature range. This current project utilized the protocol established in the previous phase to evaluate next-generation lithium-ion battery technologies for use in cold regions. Selected battery technologies met necessary military specifications for use in large military combat vehicles and were evaluated using a mechanical load system developed in previous work to simulate the starting of a Stryker engine. This work also evaluated the performance of the existing battery technology of a Stryker under Alaskan winter temperatures, which will verify the accuracy of the simulated cold room testing on the mechanical load system. The results of the tests showed that while the system was able to reliably operate down to −20°C, the battery management system encountered challenges at the lower end of the temperature range. This technology has a potential to reliably support cold regions operations but needs further evaluation. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | United States. Army. Corps of Engineers. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract .................................................................................................................................... ii Figures and Tables .................................................................................................................. iv Preface ..................................................................................................................................... vi 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective .............................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Approach ............................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Impact to the Army .............................................................................................. 2 2 Technology Review........................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Current technology .............................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Lead-acid batteries ................................................................................. 4 2.1.2 Ultracapacitors ........................................................................................ 4 2.2 Lithium-ion batteries ........................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Lithium-ion battery chemistries .............................................................. 6 2.3 Battery cold performance challenges ............................................................... 8 2.4 MIL-PRF-32565B performance specification .................................................... 8 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Test battery selection ....................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 Battery requirements ............................................................................11 3.1.2 Bren-Tronics Inc. battery ...................................................................... 13 3.2 Test Setup.......................................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 CRREL cold room testing ...................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Alaska field testing ................................................................................15 3.3 Test Procedure ................................................................................................. 20 4 Results ............................................................................................................................. 23 4.1 CRREL cold room testing ................................................................................. 23 4.1.1 Data at 28°C ........................................................................................ 23 4.1.2 Data at 0°C .......................................................................................... 25 4.1.3 Data at −20°C....................................................................................... 27 4.1.4 Data at −40°C...................................................................................... 30 4.2 Alaska field testing .......................................................................................... 30 4.2.1 Calibration vehicle tests ...................................................................... 30 4.2.2 Stryker battery system tests ................................................................ 33 4.3 Discussion ........................................................................................................ 36 5 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 38 References ............................................................................................................................. 40 Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................... 43 Report Documentation Page (SF 298) ............................................................................... 44 | - |
dc.format.extent | 52 pages / 2.73 MB | - |
dc.format.medium | - | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.) | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Technical Report (Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)) ; no. ERDC/CRREL TR-22-23 | - |
dc.rights | Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited | - |
dc.source | This Digital Resource was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat | - |
dc.subject | Batteries | en_US |
dc.subject | Cold regions | en_US |
dc.subject | Energy | en_US |
dc.subject | Lithium ion batteries--Effect of temperature on | en_US |
dc.subject | Lithium-ion | en_US |
dc.subject | Low temperature | en_US |
dc.subject | Mobility | en_US |
dc.subject | Resilience | en_US |
dc.subject | Stryker | en_US |
dc.subject | Vehicles, Military | en_US |
dc.title | Cold regions vehicle start : next-generation lithium-ion battery technologies for Stryker vehicles | en_US |
dc.type | Report | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Technical Report |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ERDC-CRREL TR-22-23.pdf | 2.73 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |