Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/43282
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClausen, Jay L.-
dc.contributor.authorHarmon, R. S. (Russell S.)-
dc.contributor.authorBeal, Samuel A.-
dc.contributor.authorBishop, Meghan-
dc.contributor.authorHark, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorPlumer, John R.-
dc.creatorCold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (U.S.)-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T14:19:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-14T14:19:00Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.govdocERDC/CRREL MP-22-5-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11681/43282-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/43282-
dc.descriptionMiscellaneous Paperen_US
dc.description.abstractCommercially available handheld chemical analyzers for forensic applications have been available for over a decade. Portable systems from multiple vendors can perform X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared(FTIR) spectroscopy, and recently laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Together, we have been exploring the development and potential applications of a multisensor system consisting of XRF, Raman, and LIBS for environmental characterization with a focus on soils from military ranges. Handheld sensors offer the potential to substantially increase sample throughput through the elimination of transport of samples back to the laboratory and labor-intensive sample preparation procedures. Further, these technologies have the capability for extremely rapid analysis, on the order of tens of seconds or less. We have compared and evaluated results from the analysis of several hundred soil samples using conventional laboratory bench top inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) for metals evaluation and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Raman spectroscopy for detection and characterization of energetic materials against handheld XRF, LIBS, and Raman analyzers. The soil samples contained antimony, copper, lead, tungsten, and zinc as well as energetic compounds such as 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene(TNT), hexahydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), nitroglycerine (NG), and dinitrotoluene isomers (DNT). Precision, accuracy, and sensitivity of the handheld field sensor technologies were compared against conventional laboratory instrumentation to determine their suitability for field characterization leading to decisional outcomes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Army. Corps of Engineers.en_US
dc.format.medium22 pages / 2.99 MB-
dc.format.mediumPDF-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMiscellaneous Paper (Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)) ; no. ERDC/CRREL MP-22-5-
dc.rightsApproved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited-
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat-
dc.subjectScientific apparatus and instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectChemistry, Analyticen_US
dc.subjectSoils--Testingen_US
dc.subjectRaman spectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectX-ray spectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectLaser-induced breakdown spectroscopyen_US
dc.titleA comparison of handheld field chemical sensors for soil characterization with a focus on LIBSen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Miscellaneous Paper

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ERDC-CRREL MP-22-5.pdf2.99 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open