Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/39661
Title: Rapid Airfield Damage Recovery Next Generation Backfill Technologies Comparison Experiment : Technology Comparison Experiment
Authors: Mejias-Santiago, Mariely
Garcia, Lyan I.
Edwards, Lulu
Keywords: Airfield damage repair
Expedient pavement repair
Runways (Aeronautics) — Maintenance and repair
Impact craters
Mechanical stabilization
Chemical stabilization
Expanding polyurethane foam
Cratering
Soil stabilization
Cement stabilization
Geocells
Pavements, Concrete
Polyurethanes
Publisher: Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (U.S.)
Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)
Series/Report no.: Technical Report (Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.));no.ERDC/GSL TR-21-2
Abstract: The Rapid Airfield Damage Recovery (RADR) Next Generation Backfill Technology Comparison Experiment was conducted in July 2017 at the East Campus of the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), located in Vicksburg, MS. The experiment evaluated three different crater backfill technologies to compare their performance and develop a technology trade-off a nalysis. The RADR next generation backfill technologies were compared to the current RADR standard backfill method of flowable fill. Results from this experiment provided useful information on technology rankings and trade-offs. This effort resulted in successful crater backfill solutions that were recommended for further end user evaluation.
Description: Technical Report
Gov't Doc #: ERDC/GSL TR-21-2
Rights: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/39661
http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/39661
Appears in Collections:Technical Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ERDC-GSL TR-21-2.pdf55.9 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open