Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/3962
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFischenich, J. Craig, 1962-en_US
dc.creatorEnvironmental Laboratory (U.S.)en_US
dc.creatorEcosystem Management and Restoration Research Program (U.S.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-16T16:16:00Zen_US
dc.date.available2016-03-16T16:16:00Zen_US
dc.date.issued2006-09en_US
dc.identifier.govdocERDC TN-EMRRP SR-52en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11681/3962en_US
dc.descriptionTechnical Noteen_US
dc.description.abstractThe National Research Council (1996) defined restoration as “the return of the form and function of an ecosystem to its predisturbance condition…” This definition presents two challenges when working in today’s environment. First, the significant hydrological changes and infrastructure encroachments found in many watersheds often prevent the reestablishment of the stream form to a condition prior to disturbance. These streams have a new form consistent with the altered conditions, and may not be able to maintain functions associated with a pre-disturbance condition. Second, while the general concept of “functions” can be grasped by most, the specific functions provided by streams and riparian corridors have yet to be defined in a manner that can serve as a basis for assessment, design, and management. The recommendations presented in this document center on the recognition that the character of stream systems (and, thus, their value or potential to support certain uses) is a result of a set of dynamic and interrelated processes referred to as functions in this report. Fifteen critical functions were identified by a committee of U.S. and international scientists, engineers, and practitioners, and were synthesized into a framework for ecosystem evaluation. Understanding the basic functions of streams and riparian corridors provides planners and designers with a concise and effective basis from which to evaluate proposed projects, and offers several powerful advantages over assessments that focus upon beneficial uses. Use of functions and processes can be elegantly incorporated within a systems approach, enhancing understanding, enabling predictions, and supporting management decisions. This report presents the functional framework and discusses ways in which the framework can be applied to support the Corps’ Ecosystem Restoration and Urban Flood Damage Reduction Programs.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEcosystem Management and Restoration Research Program (U.S.)en_US
dc.format.extent18 pages/324 KBsen_US
dc.format.mediumPDF/Aen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)en_US
dc.relationhttp://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/en_US/search/asset/1004313en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnical Note (Ecosystem Management and Restoration Research Program (U.S.)) ; no. ERDC TN-EMRRP SR-52en_US
dc.rightsApproved for public release; distribution is unlimiteden_US
dc.sourceThis Digital Resources was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobaten_US
dc.subjectWatershed managementen_US
dc.subjectStream restorationen_US
dc.subjectRiparian restorationen_US
dc.titleFunctional objectives for stream restorationen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Technical Note

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ERDC-TN-EMRRP-SR-52.pdf323.17 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open