Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/3919
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOwens, Chetta S.-
dc.contributor.authorSmart, R. Michael.-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Paul E.-
dc.contributor.authorSpickard, Matthew R.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-16T16:08:57Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-16T16:08:57Z-
dc.date.issued2010-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11681/3919-
dc.descriptionTechnical Note-
dc.description.abstractQuantifying biomass to measure aquatic plant abundance can be costly and labor intensive. This technical note compares several alternate, less exhaustive techniques for biomass sampling in the field.-
dc.description.sponsorshipAquatic Plant Control Research Program (U.S.)-
dc.publisherEnvironmental Laboratory (U.S.)-
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)-
dc.relationhttp://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/en_US/search/asset/1003837-
dc.subjectAquatic plants--Sampling--Wisconsin--Shawano Lake-
dc.titleComparison of three biomass sampling techniques on submersed aquatic plants in a northern tier lake-
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Technical Note

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
TN-APCRP-EA-24.pdf293.58 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open