Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11681/3919
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Owens, Chetta S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Smart, R. Michael. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, Paul E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Spickard, Matthew R. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-16T16:08:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-03-16T16:08:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-07 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11681/3919 | - |
dc.description | Technical Note | - |
dc.description.abstract | Quantifying biomass to measure aquatic plant abundance can be costly and labor intensive. This technical note compares several alternate, less exhaustive techniques for biomass sampling in the field. | - |
dc.description.sponsorship | Aquatic Plant Control Research Program (U.S.) | - |
dc.publisher | Environmental Laboratory (U.S.) | - |
dc.publisher | Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.) | - |
dc.relation | http://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/en_US/search/asset/1003837 | - |
dc.subject | Aquatic plants--Sampling--Wisconsin--Shawano Lake | - |
dc.title | Comparison of three biomass sampling techniques on submersed aquatic plants in a northern tier lake | - |
dc.type | Report | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Technical Note |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
TN-APCRP-EA-24.pdf | 293.58 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |