Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/35534
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUnited States. Army. Corps of Engineers. New Orleans District-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-12T16:58:14Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-12T16:58:14Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11681/35534-
dc.descriptionIndividual Environmental Report Supplement-
dc.description.abstractThe U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi Valley Division, New Orleans District, has prepared this Individual Environmental Report Supplement (IERS) # 8,9,10.a to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the proposed modification to flood protection improvements to the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System in Orleans, St. Bernard, and Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana. The CEMVN initially evaluated the potential impacts associated with constructing the selected plans for HSDRRS around the Chalmette Loop area of the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity in three IERs. A Decision Record for IER #8 titled Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, Bayou Dupre Control Structure, St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana was signed on June 23, 2009. IER #8 evaluated the potential effects associated with the construction and improvement of a flood control structure on Bayou Dupre (LPV 144.02). A Decision Record for IER #9 titled LPV, Caernarvon Floodwall, St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana was signed on February 8, 2010. IER #9 evaluated the potential effects associated with construction of a new floodwall alignment to the west of the Caernarvon Canal to replace the existing Caernarvon Floodwall (LPV 149). A Decision Record for IER #10 titled LPV Chalmette Loop Levee, St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana was signed on May 26, 2009. IER #10 evaluated the potential effects associated with raising the Chalmette Loop Levee reaches LPV 145, LPV 146, LPV 147, and LPV 148.02 to the 100-year level of risk reduction. These original IERs are incorporated by reference into this IERS 8,9,10.a. Copies of the documents and other supporting information are available upon request or at www.nolaenvironmental.gov. To evaluate the potential impacts for a design change to the original Chalmette Loop T-wall project, the CEMVN is preparing this IERS #8,9,10.a entitled “Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, Bayou Dupre Control Structure, Caernarvon Floodwall and Chalmette Loop, Orleans, St. Bernard, and Plaquemines Parishes, Louisiana." The proposed modification described in this supplement pertains to enabling operation and maintenance access for the LPV 145a, LPV 145 – LPV 149 reaches and a tie-in to the Mississippi River Levee.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................4 1.1 BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................6 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ......................11 1.3 AUTHORITY FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ......................................11 1.4 PRIOR REPORTS.........................................................................................11 1.5 INTEGRATION WITH OTHER INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS.......................................................................................................14 1.6 PUBLIC CONCERNS ...................................................................................15 2. ALTERNATIVES................................................................................................15 2.1 ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY SCREENING CRITERIA.............................................................................15 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES .............................................15 2.3 PROPOSED ACTION...................................................................................16 2.4 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION..................................28 2.4.1 LPV 145a, LPV 145, LPV 146, LPV 148.02 and LPV 149 (LPV 145- 149) and MRL tie-in.................................................................................28 2.4.1.1 No Action. .....................................................................................28 2.5 ALTERNATIVES ELIMINATED FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION .......................................................................................28 2.5.1 LPV 145a Bayou Bienvenue Bridge and LPV 145-149 Flood side Access Road ..............................................................................................28 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ..............................................................................................29 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..................................................................29 3.2 SIGNIFICANT RESOURCES .....................................................................29 3.2.1 Upland Communities...............................................................................30 3.2.2 Bayous and Canals (Bayou Bienvenue, Bayou Dupre, Jourda and Caernarvon Canal) ..................................................................................32 3.2.3 Wildlife......................................................................................................37 3.2.4 Threatened and Endangered Species .....................................................41 3.2.5 Air Quality................................................................................................44 3.2.6 Noise ..........................................................................................................45 3.2.7 Transportation .........................................................................................47 3.3 SOCIOECONOMIC RESOURCES ............................................................49 4. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ................................................................................50 5. SELECTION RATIONALE...............................................................................52 6. COORDINATION AND CONSULTATION....................................................53 6.1 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT...........................................................................53 6.2 AGENCY COORDINATION.......................................................................53 7. MITIGATION......................................................................................................56 8. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS56 9. CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................56 9.1 FINAL DECISION ........................................................................................56 9.2 PREPARED BY .............................................................................................58 9.3 LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................59 Appendix A: List of Acronyms Appendix B: Public Comment Appendix C: Members of Interagency Environmental Team Appendix D: Interagency and Tribal Government Correspondence-
dc.format.extent109 pages / 13.37 Mb-
dc.format.mediumPDF/A-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUnited States. Army. Corps of Engineers. New Orleans District.en_US
dc.rightsApproved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited-
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat-
dc.subjectPontchartrain, Lake (La.)en_US
dc.subjectFlood controlen_US
dc.subjectHurricanesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental managementen_US
dc.subjectWetlandsen_US
dc.titleIndividual Environmental Report Supplement, Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, Chalmette Loop Levee and Caernarvon Floodwall, Orleans, St. Bernard and Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, IERS #8,9,10.aen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Environmental Documents

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IER 8 9 10a Supplemental Final Document.pdf13.7 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open