Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/35514
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMelendy, Terry D.-
dc.contributor.authorMenke, Amelia M.-
dc.contributor.authorFriedman, Daphnie C.-
dc.contributor.authorWinter, Reed R.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-11T15:37:17Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-11T15:37:17Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-
dc.identifier.govdocERDC/CRREL TR-20-2-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11681/35514-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/35514-
dc.descriptionTechnical Report-
dc.description.abstractThe United States Antarctic Program (USAP) anticipates replacing the light-truck fleet in the next 2–5 years and requested a detailed look at the potential tires to be used for ice-shelf work. The USAP fleet management team has worked to reduce the curb weight of potential truck options in an effort to minimize the impact on the snow roads. With current Ford F-350 pickups weighing in at 7840 lb empty and a ground pressure of approximately 17 psi, selecting a lighter truck frame would present major ad-vantages. Similarly, operating the current Mattracks (track system in lieu of tires) installed on some of on the light-truck fleet has run between $35 and $50 an hour over the past 6 years, costing the USAP program as much as $40,000 per season per vehicle. A light truck on tires, for comparison, operated at $6 per hour at McMurdo Station over the same time span. Following testing of nine different types of tires, this report concludes that a suitable tire replacement for the light-truck fleet is commercially available. The BFGoodrich K2, particularly in the Light Truck 32.8 in. (nominally 33 in.) diameter size (BFG LT33), shows significant advantages at all sizes in this tread pattern.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering for Polar Operations, Logistics, and Research Program (U.S.)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.). Office of Polar Programs.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract .......................................................................................................................................................... ii Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................................ iv Preface ............................................................................................................................................................ vi Unit Conversion Factors .............................................................................................................................vii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Approach ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 Procedure ............................................................................................................................................... 4 3 Tires Tested ............................................................................................................................................ 7 4 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Ground contact pressure ................................................................................................ 9 4.2 Tire load ......................................................................................................................... 12 4.3 Contact area.................................................................................................................. 14 4.4 Internal tire pressure .................................................................................................... 18 4.5 Modification .................................................................................................................. 20 5 Truck Comparison ............................................................................................................................... 22 6 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................................................. 24 References ................................................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix A: Pressure Maps ...................................................................................................................... 27 Report Documentation Page-
dc.format.extent47 pages / 6.272 Mb-
dc.format.mediumPDF/A-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (U.S.)en_US
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnical Report (Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)) ; no. ERDC/CRREL TR-20-2-
dc.rightsApproved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited-
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat-
dc.subjectEngineering--Cold weather conditionsen_US
dc.subjectEPOLARen_US
dc.subjectMcMurdo Station (Antarctica)--Logisticsen_US
dc.subjectNSFen_US
dc.subjectRoads--Antarcticaen_US
dc.subjectSnow mechanicsen_US
dc.subjectTrucks--Tiresen_US
dc.subjectTires--Testingen_US
dc.titleSnow-road light-truck tire testingen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Technical Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ERDC-CRREL TR-20-2.pdf6.42 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open