Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/35498
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUnited States. Army. Corps of Engineers. New Orleans District-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-10T20:17:31Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-10T20:17:31Z-
dc.date.issued2010-02-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11681/35498-
dc.descriptionIndividual Environmental Report Supplemental-
dc.description.abstractThe U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi Valley Division, New Orleans District, has prepared this Individual Environmental Report Supplemental #6 (IERS #6) to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the proposed project modifications to the original IER #6. The proposed project modifications are located in Orleans Parish, Louisiana. For the purposes of this IER Supplemental, the proposed project modifications are shown by reaches. Each reach is identified by a project identification number (e.g., LPV 106). Only those reaches associated with the proposed project revisions, referred to as the proposed action throughout this Supplemental, are discussed in this document. On June 25, 2009, the District Commander signed the Decision Record for IER #6. IER #6 is hereby incorporated by reference into this supplemental document. Copies of the document and other supporting information are available upon request or at www.nolaenvironmental.gov. This supplemental document has been prepared to address proposed changes in the Government’s approved plan.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PRIOR REPORTS........................................................................................................ 1 2. ALTERNATIVES............................................................................................................... 2 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE ALTERNATIVES ............................................................ 2 2.2 PROPOSED ACTION.................................................................................................. 3 2.3 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION................................................. 4 _Toc251573176 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES........ 5 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ................................................................................. 5 3.2 SIGNIFICANT RESOURCES .................................................................................... 5 3.2.1 Non-wetland /Upland Resources ............................................................................. 6 3.2.2 Wildlife....................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.3 Recreational Resources ............................................................................................ 8 3.2.4 Aesthetic (Visual) Resources.................................................................................. 10 4. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ............................................................................................. 11 5. SELECTION RATIONALE............................................................................................ 11 6. COORDINATION AND CONSULTATION................................................................. 11 6.1 AGENCY COORDINATION.................................................................................... 11 7. MITIGATION................................................................................................................... 12 8. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS.......... 12 9. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................... 12 9.1 FINAL DECISION ..................................................................................................... 12 9.2 PREPARED BY .......................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A: List of Acronyms and Definitions of Common Terms Appendix B: Public Comment Appendix C: Members of Interagency Environmental Team Appendix D: Interagency Correspondence-
dc.format.extent49 pages / 3.669 Mb-
dc.format.mediumPDF/A-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUnited States. Army. Corps of Engineers. New Orleans District.en_US
dc.rightsApproved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited-
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat-
dc.subjectPontchartrain, Lake (La.)en_US
dc.subjectFlood controlen_US
dc.subjectHurricanesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental managementen_US
dc.titleFinal Individual Environmental Report Supplemental, Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, East Citrus Lakefront Levee, Orleans Parish, Louisiana, IERS #6en_US
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Environmental Documents

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IERS 6 Final Document.pdf3.76 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open