Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11681/34756
Title: | Performance of nearshore berms from dredged sediments : validation of the Sediment Mobility Tool |
Authors: | Priestas, Anthony M. McFall, Brian C. Brutsche, Katherine E. |
Keywords: | Beach nourishment Coastal sediments Hydraulic models Hydrodynamics Littoral drift Sedimentation and deposition Sediment transport Shore protection Water currents Water waves |
Publisher: | Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory (U.S.) Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.) |
Series/Report no.: | Technical Report (Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)) ; no. ERDC/CHL TR-19-19 |
Abstract: | The construction of artificial berms in the nearshore environment using dredged material has been in practice since the 1930s. While considerable progress has been achieved from both theoretical and practical considerations, placement decisions were often heuristic, based on experience, or required tedious calculations. For that reason, the Sediment Mobility Tool (SMT) was developed to make rapid, preliminary assessments of nearshore placement areas and berm migration. This technical report provides a comparative analysis between SMT results and historical field observations for nine nearshore placement projects with diverse berm geometries, sediment characteristics, and wave climates. The SMT correctly predicted nearshore berm sediment mobility and migration directions for eight of the nine historical berms studied. These sites were typically associated with shallow placement depths and energetic wave conditions. Likewise, the SMT correctly predicted stable berms for two of three sites. For one case in particular, the SMT correctly predicted a stable berm in contrast to the expectation that the berm would mobilize, which underscores the value of SMT to make informed decisions during project planning. The few discrepancies between SMT predictions and observations may be partly explained by berm geometry (mound versus linear berm), whereby application of the tool to mounded geometries may not be suitable. |
Description: | Technical Report |
Gov't Doc #: | ERDC/CHL TR-19-19 |
Rights: | Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/11681/34756 http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/34756 |
Size: | 63 pages / 3.769 Mb |
Types of Materials: | PDF/A |
Appears in Collections: | Technical Report Technical Report |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ERDC-CHL TR-19-19.pdf | 3.86 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |