Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/11681/34535Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Golish, L. Michael | - |
| dc.contributor.author | McCunn, Carrie J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Symonds, Beth A. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (U.S.) | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-07T15:55:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-11-07T15:55:19Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1993-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.govdoc | USACERL Interim Report FF-93/06 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11681/34535 | - |
| dc.description | Interim Report | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Most Architecture and Engineering (A/E) design firms and Corps of Engineers District offices have found that computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) has a great potential for improving productivity, profitability, communication, and design quality. Yet, clients' demand for design and construction information created with CADD and delivered in a variety of specified computer formats can hinder scheduling, quality control, and profitability of A/E firms. This phase of research collected information on the status and use of CADD by A/E firms to identify trends in hardware, software, CADD staffing and compensation, and trends in how design firms that use CADD have accepted this form of automation. Secondary objectives were to determine how CADD has improved design firm productivity, design quality, documentation, and profitability, and to note any outstanding problems associated with the use of CADD in the design process. | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This study was conducted for Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE) under Project 4A162784AT41, "Military Facilities Engineering Technology"; Work Unit SA-A02, "Concept Analysis Tools." | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 47 pages / 21.28Mb | - |
| dc.format.medium | PDF/A | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (U.S.) | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Technical Report (Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (U.S.));no. FF-93/06 | - |
| dc.rights | Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited | - |
| dc.source | The ERDC Library created this digital resource using one or more of the following: Zeta TS-0995, Zeutcehl OS 12000, HP HD Pro 42-in. map scanner, Epson flatbed | - |
| dc.subject | Engineers | en_US |
| dc.subject | Architects | en_US |
| dc.subject | Computer-aided design--Software | en_US |
| dc.title | The Use of Design Automation Software by Government-Contracted Architect/Engineer Firms : a Status Report | en_US |
| dc.type | Report | - |
| dcterms.abstract | Most Architecture and Engineering (A/E) design firms and Corps of Engineers District offices have found that computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) has a great potential for improving productivity, profitability, communication, and design quality. Yet, clients' demand for design and construction information created with CADD and delivered in a variety of specified computer formats can hinder scheduling, quality control, and profitability of A/E firms. This phase of research collected information on the status and use of CADD by A/E firms to identify trends in hardware, software, CADD staffing and compensation, and trends in how design firms that use CADD have accepted this form of automation. Secondary objectives were to determine how CADD has improved design firm productivity, design quality, documentation, and profitability, and to note any outstanding problems associated with the use of CADD in the design process. | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Technical Report | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USACERL Interim Report FF-93-06.pdf | 21.8 MB | Adobe PDF |  View/Open |