Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/34433
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStinson, Beryl G.-
dc.contributor.authorMobility and Environmental Systems Laboratory (U.S.)-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-30T19:32:57Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-30T19:32:57Z-
dc.date.issued1971-04-
dc.identifier.govdocTechnical Report No. 3-783 Appendix E-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11681/34433-
dc.descriptionTechnical Reporten_US
dc.description.abstractA total of 39 tests were conducted with two wheeled and two tracked vehicles at three sites at Eglin AFB, Fla., and five sites at Khon Kaen, Thailand, in an effort to establish procedures for quantifying screening effects of vegetation on driver's vision and to relate recognition distance to maximum safe speed. Recognition distance was defined in this study as that distance wherein 76 percent of the dots painted on a standard target could be counted in a vegetation assemblage. Predictions of maximum safe speeds were computed based on recognition distance, and average deviation of predicted maximum safe speed from actual average speed for each test was 3.3 mph on the safe side. It is recommended that additional testing be done to develop a less tedious and time-consuming procedure for determining recognition distance in vegetated areas and that stopping distance-soil strength relations be established.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSponsored by Advanced Research Projects Agency and Directorate of Development and Engineering, U. S. Army Materiel Command, Service Agency, U. S. Army Materiel Command, Projects Nos. 1T062112A131 and 1T062103A046-02en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsFOREWORD . . . . . . . . . . . CONVERSION FACTORS, BRITISH TO :METRIC UNITS OF MEASUREMENT SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART I: INTRODUCTION . . Background . . . . Purpose and Scope. PART II : TEST PROGRAM . . Location and Description of Test Areas . Vehicles Used. . . . . . . . . . Tests Conducted. . . . . . . . . Test Procedures and Performance Data Obtained. Terrain Data Obtained. . . . . . . . . . . PART III: ANALYSIS OF DATA. . . . . . . . . Determination of Recognition Distance from Visibility Data . . Relations of Vehicle Speed and Recognition Distance . . . . . . Predicting Maximum Safe Speed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART IV: SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . Summary of Test Results . . Recommendations . . . . . TABLES El-E3 PLATES El-E4-
dc.format.extent42 pages / 4.527Mb-
dc.format.mediumPDF/A-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherU.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnical Report (U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station);no. 3-783 app.E-
dc.rightsApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited-
dc.sourceThe ERDC Library created this digital resource using one or more of the following: Zeta TS-0995, Zeutcehl OS 12000, HP HD Pro 42-in. map scanner, Epson flatbed-
dc.subjectVehicles, Military--Dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectPlantsen_US
dc.subjectVisibilityen_US
dc.titleAn Analytical Model for Predicting Cross-Country Vehicle Performance. Appendix E, Quantification of the Screening Effects of Vegetation on Driver's Vision and Vehicle Speeden_US
Appears in Collections:Technical Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Technical Report No 3-783 App E.pdf4.64 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open