1. ERDC Knowledge Core
  2. Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC)
  3. Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) - (2/1/1961 - present)
  4. Publication
  5. Technical Report
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/34105
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarker, Amanda J.-
dc.contributor.authorBeal, Samuel A.-
dc.contributor.authorClausen, Jay L.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-19T15:48:22Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-19T15:48:22Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-
dc.identifier.govdocERDC/CRREL TR-19-18-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11681/34105-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/34105-
dc.descriptionTechnical Report-
dc.description.abstractThe results and documentation in this report summarize work supporting the Joint Base Cape Cod Camp Edwards Small-Arms Ranges (JBCC SARs) assessment of the potential for lead (Pb) and antimony (Sb) to migrate in soil and soil solutions. Batch studies were performed in an effort to interpret field results for metal concentrations at Camp Edwards SARs and to determine potential remediation strategies that limit both Pb and Sb. The batch study showed phosphate and iron treatments had minimal to no impact on Pb and Sb dissolution. However, the lime treatment significantly decreased the dissolution of Sb while increasing the dissolution of Pb. Dissolved metal concentrations decreased over the course of the 48-hour experiment regardless of treatment.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMassachusetts. Army National Guard.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract .......................................................................................................................................................... ii Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................................ iv Preface ............................................................................................................................................................. v Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... vi 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Approach ......................................................................................................................... 4 2 Methods .................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Sample collection ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Batch reactions ............................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Soil analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Water analysis ................................................................................................................. 7 3 Results and Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 9 3.1 Soil samples .................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Water samples .............................................................................................................. 11 3.3 Batch reactions ............................................................................................................. 14 3.3.1 Untreated soils ................................................................................................................... 17 3.3.2 Lime addition ..................................................................................................................... 17 3.3.3 Phosphate addition ........................................................................................................... 18 3.3.4 Iron addition ....................................................................................................................... 18 4 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 20 5 Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. 21 References ................................................................................................................................................... 22 Report Documentation Page-
dc.format.extent31 pages / 1.136 Mb-
dc.format.mediumPDF/A-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (U.S.)en_US
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnical Report (Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)) ; no. ERDC/CRREL TR-19-18-
dc.rightsApproved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited-
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat-
dc.subjectAntimonyen_US
dc.subjectLeaden_US
dc.subjectBombing and gunnery rangesen_US
dc.subjectRifle-rangesen_US
dc.subjectGroundwater--Pollutionen_US
dc.subjectCamp Edwards (Mass.)en_US
dc.titleJoint Base Cape Cod small-arms ranges : lead and antimony batch-reaction studyen_US
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Technical Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ERDC-CRREL TR-19-18.pdf1.16 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record