Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/34083
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDiJoseph, Patricia K.-
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Kenneth Ned-
dc.contributor.authorTetreault, Brian J.-
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Jonathan K.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-16T13:06:37Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-16T13:06:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-
dc.identifier.govdocERDC/CHL TR-19-15-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11681/34083-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/34083-
dc.descriptionTechnical Report-
dc.description.abstractThe United States Army Corps of Engineers needs quantitative and statistically robust metrics to evaluate the performance of Navigation projects. In addition, voyage planning for waterway stakeholders requires accurate travel time estimates for intermodal connectivity. This study develops an Inland Marine Transportation System (MTS) travel time atlas. This study presents results for the Ohio River, Upper Mississippi River, and the Illinois River for 2013 and 2014. The study develops a methodology that is flexible and scalable across space and time and so is applicable to additional inland waterways and for additional years of data. The methodology applies automatic identification system data, which includes the discrete, time-stamped locations of vessels through space and time. Results include estimated number of transits, 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentile travel times, average and median travel times, and total travel time above baseline by direction of travel and by week, month and year. Applications of the MTS statistical profile include optimizing vessel transit departure times, establishing system performance baselines, locating system bottlenecks and areas with most critical needs, comparing performance pre- and post-operations and maintenance, analyzing effects of different variables (e.g., water level, vessel type, traffic volume) on travel time, and measuring resiliency.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNavigation Systems Research Program (U.S.)en_US
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract ................................................................................................................................................... ii Figures and Tables .................................................................................................................................. v Preface ................................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 River Information Services (RIS), e-navigation ............................................................ 2 1.3 Automatic Identification System (AIS) .......................................................................... 2 1.4 Objective ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.5 Approach ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.6 Report organization ....................................................................................................... 7 2 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 AIS applications ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1.1 Environmental impact ................................................................................................. 8 2.1.2 Safety and security ..................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3 Traffic patterns and travel times ................................................................................ 9 2.2 Vehicle travel time prediction and estimation ............................................................. 9 2.2.1 Path-based vs. link-based travel time ...................................................................... 10 2.2.2 Errors in the data source .......................................................................................... 11 3 Methodology to Estimate Travel Times ...................................................................................... 12 3.1 Step 1. Define links ..................................................................................................... 14 3.2 Step 2. Estimate link travel times of individual transits ............................................ 16 3.3 Step 3. Identify and remove outliers .......................................................................... 18 3.4 Step 4. Calculate link travel time performance measures ........................................ 19 3.4.1 Link travel time performance measures.................................................................. 19 3.4.2 Total travel time above baseline .............................................................................. 19 3.5 Step 5. Calculate Origin-Destination (O-D) travel time performance measures ................................................................................................................................ 20 4 Case Study: Ohio River ................................................................................................................. 22 4.1 River description .......................................................................................................... 22 4.2 AIS data acquisition ..................................................................................................... 23 4.3 Origins and destinations ............................................................................................. 23 4.4 Links ............................................................................................................................. 24 4.5 Ohio River results ........................................................................................................ 33 4.5.1 Link number of transits and Nationwide Automatic Identification System (NAIS) sampling rate .................................................................................................................. 33 4.5.2 Link travel times by percentile ................................................................................. 35 4.5.3 Link travel times average, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (COV) ........................................................................................................................... 39 4.5.4 Navigational pass – additional consideration ......................................................... 42 4.5.5 Link total travel time above baseline ....................................................................... 43 4.5.6 O-D percentile travel times ....................................................................................... 45 5 Case Study: Upper Mississippi River .......................................................................................... 58 5.1 River description .......................................................................................................... 58 5.2 AIS data acquisition ..................................................................................................... 60 5.3 Origins and destinations ............................................................................................. 60 5.4 Links ............................................................................................................................. 61 5.5 Upper Mississippi River results .................................................................................. 69 5.5.1 Link number of transits and NAIS sampling rate .................................................... 69 5.5.2 Link travel times by percentile ................................................................................. 70 5.5.3 Link travel times average, standard deviation, and COV ........................................ 74 5.5.4 Link total travel time above baseline ....................................................................... 77 5.5.5 O-D percentile travel times ....................................................................................... 78 6 Case Study: Illinois River ............................................................................................................. 84 6.1 River description .......................................................................................................... 84 6.2 AIS data acquisition ..................................................................................................... 85 6.3 Origins and destinations ............................................................................................. 85 6.4 Links ............................................................................................................................. 86 6.5 Illinois River results ..................................................................................................... 88 6.5.1 Link number of transits and AIS sampling rate ....................................................... 89 6.5.2 Link travel times by percentile ................................................................................. 90 6.5.3 Link travel times average, standard deviation, and COV ........................................ 93 6.5.4 Link total travel time above baseline ....................................................................... 94 6.5.5 O-D percentile travel times ....................................................................................... 95 7 Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research ................................................... 100 References ......................................................................................................................................... 102 Appendix A: Primary AIS Message Fields ...................................................................................... 106 Appendix B: Ohio River Additional Results .................................................................................... 109 Appendix C: Upper Mississippi River Additional Results ............................................................. 225 Appendix D: Illinois River Additional Results ................................................................................. 346 Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 371 Unit Conversion Factors .................................................................................................................... 372 Report Documentation Page-
dc.format.extent382 pages / 11.75 Mb-
dc.format.mediumPDF-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCoastal and Hydraulics Laboratory (U.S.)en_US
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnical Report (Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)) ; no. ERDC/CHL TR-19-15-
dc.rightsApproved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited-
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat-
dc.subjectShips--Automatic identification systemsen_US
dc.subjectInland navigationen_US
dc.subjectNavigation--Performanceen_US
dc.subjectOperations researchen_US
dc.subjectSystem analysisen_US
dc.titleInland Marine Transportation System travel time atlas via Automatic Identification System (AIS) data : Ohio River, Upper Mississippi River, and Illinois Riveren_US
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Technical Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ERDC-CHL TR-19-15.pdf12.03 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open