Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/29355
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrucker, Beth A.-
dc.contributor.authorTemeyer, Andy C.-
dc.contributor.authorCarrasquillo-Mangual, Mariangelicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Jillian M.-
dc.contributor.authorMudd, Carl S.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T13:51:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-20T13:51:21Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-
dc.identifier.govdocERDC/CERL TR-18-26-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11681/29355-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/29355-
dc.descriptionTechnical Report-
dc.description.abstractThe USACE/Industry BIM Consortium has been developing a specification and standardized delivery process for collecting and exchanging facility data required by the Department of Defense and the Army for downstream applications. This effort produced a new Unified Facilities Guide Specification, UFGS 01 78 24.00 10 (Facility Data Requirements), which defines a prioritized set of assets and data attributes. A project-development team performed a pilot study to validate that these assets and attributes meet the Army’s needs for populating their Operations and Maintenance data systems. The focus of the pilot study was to verify that asset data collected during facility construction at three Army installations could effectively be imported to the Army General Fund Enterprise Business System (GFEBS). With the help of GFEBS experts from Installation Management Command, the project team developed a Facility Data Workbook (FDW), a spreadsheet application that facilitates the collection of facility data and translates the data into the GFEBS equipment input format. An FDW was developed for each selected facility at the pilot sites and the GFEBS input process at each installation was evaluated. Recommended changes to the specification have been drafted and will be evaluated for inclusion in an update to the guide specification.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Department of the Army. Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInstallation Technology Transition Program (U.S.)-
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract .................................................................................................................................... ii Figures and Tables ................................................................................................................... v Preface ..................................................................................................................................... vi 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Approach ............................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Technology transfer websites ............................................................................ 3 2 Installation Pilots ............................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Fort Leonard Wood ............................................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Facility data overview .................................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Installation asset-management process ................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Outcome ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Fort Benning ...................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Facility data overview .................................................................................................. 8 2.2.2 Installation asset-management process ................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Outcome ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 West Point ........................................................................................................11 2.3.1 Facility data overview ................................................................................................ 11 2.3.2 Installation asset-management process ................................................................. 11 2.3.3 Outcome .................................................................................................................... 12 3 Findings ........................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Facility Data Workbook ................................................................................... 13 3.2 Recommended revisions of UFGS 01 78 24.00 10 ...................................... 17 3.2.1 Inclusion of more assets ........................................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Statement of intent for FDW required assets .......................................................... 18 3.2.3 FDW revisions ............................................................................................................ 19 3.3 Data exchange format comparison ................................................................19 3.4 GFEBS data input process .............................................................................. 24 4 Summary and Recommendations ................................................................................ 28 4.1 Summary ......................................................................................................... 28 4.2 Recommendations ......................................................................................... 29 4.2.1 FDE implementation recommendations .................................................................. 29 4.2.2 Related recommendations for USACE ..................................................................... 29 4.2.3 Related recommendations for ASCIM and IMCOM ................................................. 30 References ............................................................................................................................. 31 Appendix: Current Specifications and Policy .................................................................... 33 Report Documentation Page-
dc.format.extent49 pages / 2.21 Mb-
dc.format.mediumPDF/A-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherConstruction Engineering Research Laboratory (U.S.)en_US
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnical Report (Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)) ; no. ERDC/CERL TR-18-26-
dc.rightsApproved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited-
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat-
dc.subjectMilitary bases--Buildings--Information storage and retrieval systemsen_US
dc.subjectBuilding information modelingen_US
dc.subjectMilitary construction operationsen_US
dc.subjectData curationen_US
dc.titleFacility data exchange pilot demonstration for the Army General Fund Enterprise Business System (GFEBS)en_US
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Technical Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ERDC-CERL TR-18-26.pdf2.27 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open