Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/22745
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWurbs, Ralph Allen.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-18T18:17:16Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-18T18:17:16Z-
dc.date.issued1986-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11681/22745-
dc.description.abstractAbstract: This report provides a comparative evaluation of several leading state-of-the-art models for dam-breach flood forecasting. Nine alternative models were applied using data sets from four case studies. Results obtained were compared between models and with available measured data. Model accuracy, versatility, and ease-of-use were evaluated, and complexities and weaknesses were identified. The sensitivity of model results to various input data parameters was also investigated. The quantitative results documented by the report provide an empirical data base for analyzing the performance of the models under various conditions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEnvironmental Laboratory (U.S.)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMiscellaneous Paper;EL-79-6 Report 12-
dc.subjectFlood forecasting--Mathematical models--Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectFlood dams and reservoirsen_US
dc.subjectDam failuresen_US
dc.subjectStorm surgesen_US
dc.subjectFlood controlen_US
dc.subjectMilitary hydrologyen_US
dc.titleMilitary hydrology : Report 12, Case study evaluation of alternative dam-breach flood wave models. Volume 1 : Main reporten_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
Appears in Collections:Documents

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MP EL-79-6 Report 12 Volume 1.pdf8.69 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open