Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Dredge bucket comparison demonstration at Boston Harbor|
|Authors:||Welp, Timothy L.|
Hayes, Donald F.
Tubman, Michael W. (Michael Wright), 1951-
Fredette, Thomas J., 1955-
Clausner, James E.
CableArm Clamshell Bucket
Confined Aquatic Disposal
Conventional Clamshell Bucket
Enclosed Clamshell Bucket
|Publisher:||Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory (U.S.)|
Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)
|Series/Report no.:||Technical note (Coastal and Hydraulics Engineering (U.S.)) ; VI-35.|
PURPOSE: Sediment resuspension and loading characteristics of a Conventional (open-faced) clamshell bucket, an Enclosed clamshell bucket, and a CableArm® clamshell bucket were studied under similar operating and environmental conditions in Boston Harbor during August 1999. Monitoring was conducted to characterize each buckets near and far field sediment resuspension characteristics. Bucket-loading characteristics were investigated with regard to water-to-solids ratios dredged by the different buckets. Documentation of sediment resuspension in the water column and loading characteristics with conventional and enclosed clamshell buckets (a bucket type that includes both the contractor-built Enclosed and the CableArm buckets) will assist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Districts in making bucket selection decisions and provide data for the fate of dredged material numerical model verification.
|Rights:||Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.|
|Appears in Collections:||CHETN - SECTION 06 - Misc Coastal Subjects|
Files in This Item:
|CHETN-VI-35.pdf||1.52 MB||Adobe PDF|