Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorU.S. Army Environmental Command.-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Adam D.-
dc.contributor.authorTooker, Megan W.-
dc.descriptionTechnical Report-
dc.descriptionAbstract: This document presents an analysis of the applicability of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Program Comment for Common Post-1945 Concrete and Steel Bridges with the Federal Highway Administration in regards to Army-owned bridges. The Program Comment eliminates “individual historic review requirements under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for common post-1945 concrete and steel bridges and culverts” for the FHWA in certain cases. The Program Comment can be used for post-1945 bridges owned by other federal agencies under certain circumstances. It was the determination of the authors of this report that the Army would gain no significant benefit by utilizing the existing Program Comment for Common Post-1945 Concrete and Steel Bridges, but it may benefit the Army to request a program comment of its own from the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to cover post-1945 concrete, steel, and wood bridges.-
dc.publisherConstruction Engineering Research Laboratory (U.S.)-
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)-
dc.rightsApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.-
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created in Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat-
dc.subjectProgram Comment-
dc.subjectFederal Highway Administration-
dc.titleApplicability of the FHWA Program Comment for common post-1945 concrete and steel bridges-
Appears in Collections:Technical Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ERDC-CERL-TR-15-31.pdf21.92 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail