Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Quantitative mineralogical analysis by X-ray diffraction|
|Authors:||United States. Assistant Secretary of the Army (R & D).|
Buck, Alan D.
Quantitative mineralogical analysis
|Publisher:||Concrete Laboratory (U.S.)|
Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)
|Series/Report no.:||Miscellaneous paper (U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station) ; C-72-2.|
Abstract: Work was done in two phases on different combinations of soil-like crystalline materials that were mixed in the laboratory to develop a simple, rapid, and inexpensive method of doing quantitative mineralogical analyses, largely by X-ray diffraction (XRD). In Phase I, some reference minerals of clays and nonclays of suitable purity were obtained; a method of achieving a satisfactory blend of clays and nonclays was developed; various techniques including XRD, differential thermal analysis (DTA), and infrared (IR) were evaluated; and a new method for doing a quantitative mineralogical analysis by XRD was developed and partially evaluated. The basis of this method was to prepare a pair of mixtures that match the mixture to be analyzed in composition and in background intensity and bracket it in intensity of selected XR.D peaks. The range of each mineral in the bracketing mixtures was restricted, and it was assumed that there was a linear relation between amount and XRD peak intensity for each mineral. In Phase II, additional reference minerals were obtained; a system of standardizing the X-ray units by use of an external standard was put into effect, and quantitative XRD data for 87 laboratory-prepared mixtures were tabulated; and the differences in quantitative response of the same clay mineral from different sources to XRD, IR, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were evaluated. Since no practical method of controlling or eliminating differences in clay minerals due to composition, grain size, crystallinity, or combinations of these factors was found, nine mixtures were analyzed by the new XRD method while permitting these variables free rein. Results were surprisingly good, and it is believed the explanation lies in the practice developed which finds total clay content as the difference between 100 and the total of the nonclay minerals. It was concluded that the new technique of quantitative mineralogical analysis by XRD is worth using on some samples and that the tabulated data for 87 mixtures may be used for this analysis in some cases to shorten the analysis time.
|Rights:||Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.|
|Appears in Collections:||Miscellaneous Paper|
Files in This Item:
|MP-C-72-2.pdf||2.67 MB||Adobe PDF|