Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/10606
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSouth Carolina Water Resources Commission-
dc.contributor.authorBenson, Howard A.-
dc.contributor.authorBoland, Robert A.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-20T14:04:22Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-20T14:04:22Z-
dc.date.issued1977-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11681/10606-
dc.descriptionMiscellaneous Paper-
dc.descriptionAbstract: An existing comprehensive physical model that correctly reproduced tides, tidal currents, and density currents throughout the Charleston Harbor was used to determine what quantity, if any, of effluents discharged into Cooper River would be transported from three proposed discharge points (located between miles 30 and 37 on Cooper River) to the mouth of the freshwater intake canal for the reservoir (located at mile 43) and subsequently through the intake canal into the reservoir proper. In addition to travel times of the effluents to critical locations, it was desired to determine the maximum concentrations of the effluents in Cooper River and Back River Reservoir. It was desired to know the rates of increases of effluent concentrations at critical locations should the freshwater discharge from Pinopolis reduce to zero. It was also desired to know if there would be saltwater intrusion into Back River Reservoir during operation of the Schedule C and Schedule E hydrographs. Based on the results of the model tests, the following conclusions were reached : (A.) For the Schedule C hydrograph and continuous dye release at Cooper River mile 37 (sta 37C) , measurable concentrations reached the Back River Reservoir (sta BR1) within four tidal cycles after the release (Test 1). (B.) For the Schedule C hydrograph and the dye released at Cooper River mile 37 (sta 37C) at the rate of 30 cfs during each ebb phase of the tide and 0 cfs during each flood phase, measurable dye concentrations reached the Back River Reservoir (sta BR1) within four tidal cycles after the release (Test 2). (C.) For the Schedule C hydrograph and continuous dye release at Cooper River mile 33 (sta 33C) , measurable dye concentrations reached the Back River Reservoir (sta BR1) within five tidal cycles after the release (Test 3). (D.) For the Schedule C hydrograph and continuous dye released at Cooper River mile 33 (sta 33C) at the rate of 30 cfs during each ebb phase of the tide and 0 cfs during each flood phase, measurable dye concentrations reached the Back River Reservoir (sta BR1) within five tidal cycles after the release (Test 4). (E.) For the Schedule C hydrograph and continuous dye release at Cooper River mile 30 (sta 30C), measurable dye concentrations reached the Back River Reservoir (sta BR1) within 25 tidal cycles after the release (Test 5). During the period of zero flow (cycles 56-68), dye moved into the Back River Reservoir with maximum concentrations of about 0.09 to 0.13 percent of initial concentration. After resuming the Schedule C hydrograph, the dye was flushed from sta BR1 with about 0.02 to 0.05 percent still remaining at sta BR2, BR3, and BR4 when the test was terminated. (F.) For the Schedule E hydrograph and continuous dye release at Cooper River mile 37 (sta 37C) , measurable dye concentrations reached the Back River Reservoir (sta BR1) within three tidal cycles after the release (Test 6). (G.) For the Schedule C hydrograph, maximum salinities in the Back River Reservoir varied from 15 ppm total salt at sta BR1 to 46 ppm at sta BR2. For the Schedule E hydrograph, the maximum salinities varied from 10 ppm at sta BR1 to 15 ppm at sta BR2 and BR3. (H.) The upstream limit of intrusion (100 ppm) of ocean salt water (high-water slack, bottom) was approximately Cooper River mile 43 (sta 43C) for Schedule C and approximately Cooper River mile 41 (sta 41C) for Schedule E.-
dc.publisherHydraulics Laboratory (U.S.)-
dc.publisherEngineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)-
dc.relationhttp://acwc.sdp.sirsi.net/client/en_US/search/asset/1034703-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMiscellaneous paper (U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station) ; H-77-14.-
dc.rightsApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.-
dc.sourceThis Digital Resource was created from scans of the Print Resource-
dc.subjectCooper River-
dc.subjectCharleston Harbor-
dc.subjectCharleston-
dc.subjectSouth Carolina-
dc.subjectHydraulic models-
dc.subjectDispersion-
dc.subjectSalinity-
dc.subjectDye dispersion-
dc.subjectSaltwater intrusion-
dc.subjectSaltwater encroachment-
dc.subjectEffluents-
dc.titleDispersion of proposed effluent discharges and saltwater intrusion in Cooper River : hydraulic model investigation-
dc.typeReporten_US
Appears in Collections:Miscellaneous Paper

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MP-H-77-14.pdf21.81 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open