Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/10560
Title: Evaluation of minimum asphalt concrete thickness criteria
Authors: United States. Air Force. Air Combat Command.
Bell, Haley P., 1982-
Mason, Louis W.
Keywords: Asphalt concrete
Design
C-17
CBR
Department of Defense
7-15E
Heavy vehicle simulator
Instrumentation
Test section
Runway pavements
Minimum thickness
Publisher: Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory (U.S.)
Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)
Series/Report no.: ERDC/GSL TR ; 08-26.
Description: Technical Report
Abstract: Personnel of the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) were tasked by Headquarters, Air Combat Command, to evaluate the Department of Defense’s (DoD) minimum asphalt concrete thickness criteria outlined in Unified Facilities Criteria 3-260-02. Recent improvements to the DoD’s flexible pavement design procedure and a renewed emphasis on the design and construction of contingency pavements has prompted concerns regarding the design and evaluation of thin asphalt concrete pavements. An evaluation of the DoD’s minimum asphalt concrete thickness criteria was conducted during February 2007 to April 2008 under the ERDC’s Hangar 4 test facility. The project consisted of constructing a full-scale test section with six varying test items that represented three airfield types encountered in both peacetime and contingency scenarios. Four of the items met the DoD’s minimum asphalt concrete thickness criteria, and two items did not meet the criteria. Each item was instrumented and trafficked with either a C-17 wheel or an F-15E wheel using a Heavy Vehicle Simulator. Traffic test results concluded that the DoD’s current minimum asphalt concrete thickness criteria are acceptable. Further results from the evaluation are presented and include material characterization tests and data, rut depth measurements, centerline and cross section profiles, falling weight deflectometer data, instrumentation response data, and forensic investigation assessments.
Rights: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11681/10560
Appears in Collections:Technical Report

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2339.pdf3.06 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open