Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/10313
Title: Rationalizing the seismic coefficient method
Authors: Hynes, Mary Ellen.
Franklin, A. G. (Arley G.)
Keywords: Dams
Embankment dams
Earth dams
Earthquakes
Earthquake engineering
Seismic analysis
Seismic coefficient method
Hydraulic structures
Mathematical model
Numerical models
Issue Date: Jul-1984
Publisher: Geotechnical Laboratory (U.S.)
Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.)
Series/Report no.: Miscellaneous paper (U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station) ; GL-84-13.
Description: Miscellaneous Paper
Abstract: The seismic stability of embankment dams may be evaluated by a relatively simple method, originally proposed by N. M. Newmark, in cases where there is no threat of liquefaction or severe loss of shear strength under seismic shaking. This method is based on idealization of the potential slide mass as a sliding block on an inclined plane which undergoes a history of earthquake-induced accelerations. The result is a computation of the expected final displacement of the block relative to the base. A necessary refinement is the consideration of amplification of the base motions in the embankment, which is evaluated by means of a linear elastic analysis. Sliding block analyses have been done for 348 horizontal components of natural earthquakes and 6 synthetic records. These computations, together with available results of amplification analyses, suggest that a pseudostatic seismic coefficient analysis would be appropriate for embankment dams where it is not necessary to consider (A.) liquefaction or severe loss of shear strength, (B.) vulnerability of the dam to small displacements, or (C.) very severe earthquakes, of magnitude or greater. A factor of safety greater than 1.0, with a seismic coefficient equal to one-half the predicted bedrock acceleration, would assure that deformations would not be dangerously large.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11681/10313
Appears in Collections:Documents

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1029.pdf1.52 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open